Sign in
Menu
Sign up
Docs

SOC 2

ActiveCore framework

Service Organization Control 2 (SOC 2) is an auditing framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for evaluating service organizations' security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls. Based on the Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 reports provide assurance to customers about a service provider's internal controls. It is primarily used by technology and cloud service providers globally to demonstrate security practices to customers and stakeholders.

Mandatory?Voluntary — required by enterprise procurement
Who validates?Licensed CPA firm (SSAE 18). No self-assessment.
RenewalTypically annual
Observation periodType II: 3–12 months

Controls by category

70 controls are Mapped to SOC 2.

CC2.1 COSO Principle 13: The entity obtains or generates and uses relevant, quality information to support the functioning of internal control

CC3.2 COSO Principle 7: The entity identifies risks to the achievement of its objectives across the entity and analyzes risks as a basis for determining how the risks should be managed

CC3.4 COSO Principle 9: The entity identifies and assesses changes that could significantly impact the system of internal control

CC5.2 COSO Principle 11: The entity also selects and develops general control activities over technology to support the achievement of objectives

CC6.1 The entity implements logical access security software, infrastructure, and architectures over protected information assets to protect them from security events to meet the entity's objectives

CC6.2 Prior to issuing system credentials and granting system access, the entity registers and authorizes new internal and external users whose access is administered by the entity

CC6.3 The entity authorizes, modifies, or removes access to data, software, functions, and other protected information assets based on roles, responsibilities, or the system design and changes, giving consideration to the concepts of least privilege and segregation of duties, to meet the entity's objectives

CC6.6 The entity implements logical access security measures to protect against threats from sources outside its system boundaries

CC6.6: The entity implements logical access security measures to protect against threats from sources outside its system boundaries.

CC6.7 The entity restricts the transmission, movement, and removal of information to authorized internal and external users and processes, and protects it during transmission, movement, or removal to meet the entity's objectives

CC6.8: The entity implements controls to prevent or detect and act upon the introduction of unauthorized or malicious software to meet the entity's objectives.

CC7.1 To meet its objectives, the entity uses detection and monitoring procedures to identify (1) changes to configurations that result in the introduction of new vulnerabilities, and (2) susceptibilities to newly discovered vulnerabilities

CC7.2 The entity monitors system components and the operation of those components for anomalies that are indicative of malicious acts, natural disasters, and errors affecting the entity's ability to meet its objectives; anomalies are analyzed to determine whether they represent security events

CC7.2: The entity monitors system components and the operation of those components for anomalies that are indicative of malicious acts, natural disasters, and errors affecting the entity's ability to meet its objectives; anomalies are analyzed to determine whether they represent security events.

CC7.3 The entity evaluates security events to determine whether they could or have resulted in a failure of the entity to meet its objectives (security incidents) and, if so, takes actions to prevent or address such failures

CC7.5 The entity identifies, develops, and implements activities to recover from identified security incidents

CC8.1 The entity authorizes, designs, develops or acquires, configures, documents, tests, approves, and implements changes to infrastructure, data, software, and procedures to meet its objectives

Other

PI1.4 System outputs are complete, accurate, distributed only to intended parties, and retained to meet the entity's processing integrity commitments and system requirements

PI1.5 Stored data is maintained complete, accurate, and protected from unauthorized modification to meet the entity's processing integrity commitments and system requirements

FrameworkControl overlapNote
CIS GCP Benchmark v2.0.0High 86%
CIS GCP Benchmark v3.0.0High 84%
CIS GCP Benchmark v4.0.0High 84%

Frequently asked questions

What does a SOC 2 report evaluate?

A SOC 2 report is based on the AICPA SSAE 18 standard. It evaluates the service organization's controls relevant to the Trust Services Criteria of security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy.

How does a SOC 2 Type II report differ from a Type I report?

A SOC 2 Type I report covers the design of the service organization's controls at a specific point in time. A SOC 2 Type II report covers the design and operating effectiveness of those controls over a period of time.

How often are the core Google Cloud SOC 2 Type II reports issued?

The core Google Cloud and Google Workspace SOC 2 Type II reports are issued quarterly. Customers can download them via Compliance Reports Manager. Google Cloud only issues SOC 2 Type II reports.

What are bridge letters in the SOC 2 context?

Bridge letters are attestations made by the management of the service provider. They bridge the gap from the end date of the SOC report to the customer's period end date. Google Cloud creates them monthly.

On this page

Controls by categoryC1.1 The entity identifies and maintains confidential information to meet the entity's objectives related to confidentialityCC2.1 COSO Principle 13: The entity obtains or generates and uses relevant, quality information to support the functioning of internal controlCC3.2 COSO Principle 7: The entity identifies risks to the achievement of its objectives across the entity and analyzes risks as a basis for determining how the risks should be managedCC3.4 COSO Principle 9: The entity identifies and assesses changes that could significantly impact the system of internal controlCC5.2 COSO Principle 11: The entity also selects and develops general control activities over technology to support the achievement of objectivesCC6.1 The entity implements logical access security software, infrastructure, and architectures over protected information assets to protect them from security events to meet the entity's objectivesCC6.2 Prior to issuing system credentials and granting system access, the entity registers and authorizes new internal and external users whose access is administered by the entityCC6.3 The entity authorizes, modifies, or removes access to data, software, functions, and other protected information assets based on roles, responsibilities, or the system design and changes, giving consideration to the concepts of least privilege and segregation of duties, to meet the entity's objectivesCC6.6 The entity implements logical access security measures to protect against threats from sources outside its system boundariesCC6.6: The entity implements logical access security measures to protect against threats from sources outside its system boundaries.CC6.7 The entity restricts the transmission, movement, and removal of information to authorized internal and external users and processes, and protects it during transmission, movement, or removal to meet the entity's objectivesCC6.8: The entity implements controls to prevent or detect and act upon the introduction of unauthorized or malicious software to meet the entity's objectives.CC7.1 To meet its objectives, the entity uses detection and monitoring procedures to identify (1) changes to configurations that result in the introduction of new vulnerabilities, and (2) susceptibilities to newly discovered vulnerabilitiesCC7.2 The entity monitors system components and the operation of those components for anomalies that are indicative of malicious acts, natural disasters, and errors affecting the entity's ability to meet its objectives; anomalies are analyzed to determine whether they represent security eventsCC7.2: The entity monitors system components and the operation of those components for anomalies that are indicative of malicious acts, natural disasters, and errors affecting the entity's ability to meet its objectives; anomalies are analyzed to determine whether they represent security events.CC7.3 The entity evaluates security events to determine whether they could or have resulted in a failure of the entity to meet its objectives (security incidents) and, if so, takes actions to prevent or address such failuresCC7.5 The entity identifies, develops, and implements activities to recover from identified security incidentsCC8.1 The entity authorizes, designs, develops or acquires, configures, documents, tests, approves, and implements changes to infrastructure, data, software, and procedures to meet its objectivesOtherPI1.4 System outputs are complete, accurate, distributed only to intended parties, and retained to meet the entity's processing integrity commitments and system requirementsPI1.5 Stored data is maintained complete, accurate, and protected from unauthorized modification to meet the entity's processing integrity commitments and system requirementsRelated frameworksFrequently asked questions

Ask AI about this

Help improve this page